The Stand + Serious Business
While this blog is mainly for my own amusement, I do occasionally explore the more ’serious’ side of WordPress. You know what kind of places I’m talking about – the trenches where the culture war is bitterly fought between people of sane disposition and crackpot Ron Paul supporters*. Being an atheist, the topic that interests me most is probably religion and, to a lesser extent, how it affects politics. I say ‘to a lesser extent’ because I don’t have all that much interest in international cock-waving competitions and because the cock-waving in question is inevitably American.
However, this stuff does have some potential bearing on my life even though I don’t live in that cauldron of insanity, so every now and then I like to chime in on a discussion about evolution or homosexuality or some other topic that always crops up whenever believers and non-believers butt heads. I tend to feel a bit two-faced about this, however, since in those discussions I try to be as down-to-Earth and objective as possible while on this blog I use phrases like ‘cock-waving’. I’m always a bit worried that someone will click on my name and discover that I’m actually a bitter, cynical walking steretype who turned his back on God out of petty malice rather than high-minded philosophical windbaggery. For the record, then, my persona during ’serious’ discussions is far closer to the real thing than this one.
To be honest I’ve become a bit jaded with all of this internet ’serious business’ stuff. The whole global warming debate is a perfect example: it’s become so political that people treat it like some sort of holy war, and with both sides frothing at the mouth and accusing the other of being lying scumbags it’s a bit hard to find anyone to talk to about it who you’d be willing to invite into your house without palming a kitchen knife first. Which is a shame, because it’s an important topic with potentially serious ramifications for all of us regardless of who’s right.
I’m tempted to say that the internet makes people act in ways contrary to their true nature, but I actually think it’s the opposite; the internet lets people act the way they wish they could in real life, but without running the risk of getting maced – which means that people are generally self-righteous, indignant pricks who can’t handle someone disagreeing with them without going into coniptions. Woe is us.
Anyway, that’s enough of that. I mentioned before that I’m reading the ‘director’s cut’ version of The Stand, and I’m still reading it. It’s one long motherfucker, so I’ll probably still be ’still reading it’ for quite a while. Or not – as much as I like King and his stories, and as fun as it is to spot all of the Dark Tower references, the pacing is really starting to get on my nerves. King has the remarkable ability to create a character that we actually care about in just a few paragraphs, but he seems to want to show this off at every oppurtunity. For example, when the superflu is finally starting to wind down after killing almost everyone on Earth (this is around page 400, by the way) we’re told that lots more people are being killed due to the aftermath – children falling down wells and people accidentally electrocuting themselves, that kind of thing. Fair enough, King’s got his eye set on realism. Now, I would have been perfectly content with this being shown by one of the main characters coming across the fresh corpse of a woman who accidentally shot herself, or spotting a starved child lying by the side of the road. Either of those would have demonstrated pretty clearly that the post-flu world is still dangerous to those who aren’t tough enough to survive. Instead, we get eight or nine little mini-stories about a few random people dying through misadventure, complete with an unecessary amount of backstory and padding. This crap drags on a little bit too much for my liking.
Unfortunately, this is something inherent in King’s style. It’s never enough for him to show us that ‘John is an alcoholic author-insert’ by, say, having him wake up hungover for the tenth time that month. Instead he has to have a twenty-page flashback about how John’s drinking spiralled out of control after he got wasted on a high school field trip and all of his friends left him one by one and he let his mother down and he’s such an asshole and how many ways are there to say ‘this character is me under a different name’? I don’t mind it the first few times, but when it happens in every single book he writes it starts to get a bit irritating.
The Stand also suffers from glacial pacing. Most of the time the writing is good enough that you don’t care (like I said, King’s characters really are incredibly well made) but more than once I’ve found myself wishing there were less groups of characters and that the plot would move along a bit more quickly.
I’m going to stick with The Stand despite these complaints, and because there’s a character who sets giant fuel tanks on fire, but I’m starting to get a bit tired of King’s over-indulgence.
on May 23, 2008 on 1:18 am
I never keep up with American politics – Australia has its own political hiccups, so the shot probably went over my head.
I never could get into Stephen King’s books. I’ve heard the Dark Tower series was good but have not had a chance to pick any of the books up yet. Am I missing out much?
on May 23, 2008 on 11:26 am
I’d say yes, but I do like most of his books so I would. My advise would be to try out something like The Shining or ‘Salem’s Lot (I wouldn’t recommend starting out with The Dark Tower) and see what you think of those. If you can’t get into either of them, he’s probably not for you.
I actually liked ‘Salem’s Lot the most out of all of his books, though. Maybe it’s just that I have ‘vampire stories’ on the brain, but I thought he had a take on the whole thing that was simultaneously old fashioned and refreshing.
on May 25, 2008 on 10:34 am
Oh no, wow, I love The Stand! And the TV adaptation is also amazing – my favourite character is Nick… ah, Nick…
Anyway, yeah. The ending’s a bit weird but I still love that book (IT is my favourite Stephen King). Also, I really like how he does backstories, and the bit with all the extras dying was one of my favourite parts. So… each to their own, I guess, is all I’m saying here. :D
Su x
on May 25, 2008 on 2:33 pm
Hey, no problem with that ;) I also think Nick is the best character in the book – to be honest, I think the book would have been better if it was just about him (and supporting cast, obviously).
I started to read IT, really got into IT (ha ha pun) then lost IT (okay I’ll stop now…). I need to buy a new copy soon.
Thanks for stopping by!